Special Counsel Suspects Incriminating Photos on Trump Valet’s Phone in Classified Documents Case
Photo Credit: Getty Images
In a recent development within the classified documents case involving former President Donald Trump, Special Counsel Jack Smith has identified potentially incriminating evidence on the phone of Trump’s valet and co-defendant, Walt Nauta. According to a report by Newsweek, Smith’s investigation has revealed two photos on Nauta’s phone that may have significant implications for the case.
This news emerges in the context of earlier reports from CNN, which detailed allegations that Nauta was assured of a presidential pardon from Trump should he win a second term in 2024. This was reportedly promised in exchange for Nauta’s silence or misleading statements if charged with lying to the FBI during the investigation.
Nauta, who has already pleaded not guilty, is accused of assisting Trump in obstructing the Department of Justice’s investigation into the former president’s mishandling of classified documents. The ongoing legal battle has revealed complex layers of alleged misconduct and attempted cover-ups.
The focus of Smith’s recent legal maneuvering has been to persuade Judge Aileen Cannon that Nauta has had ample time to secure an expert witness who could contest the government’s claims about the classified images found on his phone. According to Newsweek, filings from the prosecution noted that Nauta’s legal team was informed months ago about the existence of the two photos, which feature classification markings, thus providing them sufficient time to prepare a defense.
Further complicating matters, the prosecution’s latest filing emphasizes that Nauta and his defense have had access to all necessary materials to mount an effective defense. This includes the images themselves and a forensic report containing metadata about those images, which were provided to the defense team as part of classified discovery procedures in October 2023.
Prosecutors are also concerned that Nauta’s claimed ignorance of the images may be a deliberate strategy to delay the trial, possibly until after the upcoming presidential election, thereby benefiting Trump’s political agenda.
The implications of these developments are significant. If it is proven that Nauta shared one of the classified images via text message, as alleged by the prosecution, it could strongly suggest that classified documents were not securely handled at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate. This would support claims that Trump’s staff had access to sensitive information, potentially breaching national security protocols.
As the trial progresses, the stakes remain high with each new piece of evidence potentially shifting the trajectory of the case. The involvement of figures close to Trump, like Nauta, and the detailed scrutiny of their actions reflect the intensive efforts by the Justice Department to unravel the full scope of the alleged misconduct in the handling of classified documents.
